Creating a digital dental model of a patient&#39;s teeth using interproximal information

ABSTRACT

Creating a digital tooth model of a patient’s tooth using interproximal information is provided. Interproximal information is received that represents a space between adjacent physical teeth of the patient. A digital teeth model of a set of physical teeth of the patient that includes the adjacent physical teeth is received. One or more digital tooth models is created that more accurately depicts one or more of the physical teeth than the corresponding digital teeth included in the digital teeth model based on the interproximal information.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Pat. Application No. 16/846,118 filed Apr. 10, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. Application No. 13/786,300, filed on Mar. 5, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,617,489, issued Apr. 14, 2020, which claims priority to and benefit of U.S. Pat. Application No. 61/739,600, filed on Dec. 19, 2012 entitled “CREATING A DIGITAL DENTAL MODEL OF A PATIENT’S TEETH USING INTERPROXIMAL INFORMATION” by Grove et al., having Attorney Docket No. 1226.US. V, and assigned to the assignee of the present application.

This application is related to co-pending U.S. Pat. Application No. 13/719,823 filed on Dec. 19, 2012 entitled “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR OPTICALLY SCANNING AN OBJECT IN REGISTRATION WITH A REFERENCE PATTERN” by Kuo, having Attorney Docket No. 1221.US.P, assigned to the assignee of the present application and to the extent not repeated herein, the contents of this related patent application are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

This application is related to co-pending U.S. Pat. Application No. 61/739,450 filed on Dec. 19, 2012 entitled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DENTAL PROCEDURES” by Kopelman, having Attorney Docket No. 1239.US.V, assigned to the assignee of the present application and to the extent not repeated herein, the contents of this related patent application are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

This application is related to co-pending U.S. Pat. Application No. 13/787,634 filed on Mar. 6, 2013, entitled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DENTAL PROCEDURES” by Kopelman, having Attorney Docket No. 1239.US.P, which claims priority to co-pending U.S. Pat. Application No. 61/739,450 filed on Dec. 19, 2012 entitled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DENTAL PROCEDURES” by Kopelman, having Attorney Docket No. 1239.US.V, assigned to the assignee of the present application.

BACKGROUND

Orthodontic treatments involve repositioning misaligned teeth and improving bite arrangements for improved cosmetic appearance and dental function. Conventionally, repositioning of teeth has been accomplished by what are commonly referred to as “braces.” Braces comprise a variety of elements such as brackets, bands, archwires, ligatures, and O-rings. After some of these elements are bonded to the teeth, periodic appointments with the treating doctor are required to adjust the braces. This involves bending or installing different archwires having different force-inducing properties, and/or replacing ligatures and O-rings.

An alternative to braces includes the use of elastic positioning dental appliances (also known as “aligners”) for repositioning teeth. Such an appliance can be comprised of a thin shell of elastic material that generally conforms to a patient’s teeth but each appliance to be used at a treatment stage has a cavity geometry that is slightly out of alignment with the teeth arrangement at the start of that treatment stage. Placement of the elastic positioning dental appliance over the teeth applies controlled forces in specific locations to gradually move the teeth into a new arrangement as defined by the cavity of the appliance. Repetition of this process moves the teeth through a series of intermediate arrangements to a final desired arrangement. Due to the limited space within the oral cavity and extensive movements that some teeth typically undergo as a part of treatment, the teeth will often be moved throughout the series of intermediate tooth arrangements to properly arrange the teeth. Thus, a single patient treated with elastic positioning dental appliance may experience from 2 to perhaps 50 or more aligner stages (with an average of 25-30 aligner stages per arch) before achieving the final desired teeth arrangement.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this Description of Embodiments, illustrate various embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain principles discussed below:

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a patient’s physical teeth, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a digital teeth model that represents the patient’s set of physical teeth, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a conventional three dimensional (3D) virtual model that was created based on a digital teeth model, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 4 illustrates the use of an instrument to measure an interproximal space between adjacent physical teeth, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a user interface, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of created digital tooth models, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 7 illustrates a system for creating a digital tooth model of a patient’s tooth using interproximal information, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 8 illustrates a method of creating a digital tooth model of a patient’s tooth using interproximal information, according to one embodiment.

FIGS. 9 a-9 f depict scannable objects that can be inserted between adjacent physical teeth and used as a part of determining interproximal information that represents a space between the adjacent physical teeth, according to various embodiments.

FIGS. 10 a-10 c depict scannable objects inserted between adjacent physical teeth, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 11 depicts a digital tooth that represents one tooth that may be used to match or closely approximate the position of a corresponding tooth, according to one embodiment.

FIGS. 12A and 12B depict an example of a patient’s physical teeth at various stages of position as a part of performing interproximal reduction, according to various embodiments.

The drawings referred to in this Brief Description should not be understood as being drawn to scale unless specifically noted.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Reference will now be made in detail to various embodiments of the subject matter, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While various embodiments are discussed herein, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit to these embodiments. On the contrary, the presented embodiments are intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the various embodiments as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following Description of Embodiments, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present subject matter. However, embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the described embodiments.

Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the description of embodiments, discussions utilizing terms such as “receiving,” “accessing,” “creating,” “depicting,” “specifying,” “obtaining,” “representing,” “corresponding,” “including,” “identifying,” “removing,” “moving,” “determining,” or the like, refer to the actions and processes of a computer system, data storage system, storage system controller, microcontroller, processor, or similar electronic computing device or combination of such electronic computing devices. The computer system or similar electronic computing device manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system’s/device’s registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system’s/device’s memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission, or display devices.

Various methods can be used for creating digital teeth models that can be used for record keeping/visualization, restorative or orthodontic purposes. One of the orthodontic purposes which digital teeth models can be used is to help create dental appliances for correcting the position of a patient’s teeth. One method involves making a three dimensional (3D) virtual model of the patient’s physical teeth. The three-dimensional virtual model can be based on a digital directly or indirectly of a patient’s teeth such as directly by an intraoral scan or other direct scan of a patient’s physical teeth or indirectly based on a scan of a manually obtained impression of the patient’s physical teeth or a scan of a model made from a manually obtained impression of the patient’s physical teeth. All of these are collectively referred to as a digital scan. One or more elastic positioning dental appliances can be fabricated from digital data that is created based on the three-dimensional virtual model.

Frequently a patient’s physical teeth have interproximal spaces between them—either naturally occurring or intentionally created by the doctor—which a fully successful course of treatment will close, significantly reduce or even enlarge (as in the case for making space for restorative dental treatments). Typically, an interproximal space between two adjacent physical teeth that is smaller than approximately 0.25 millimeters (mm) may be too small to be represented in a digital scan obtained, for example, as set out in paragraph (18).

Therefore, the interproximal space may not be properly represented in a conventional three dimensional (3D) virtual model that is created based on the digital scan. The digital teeth in a conventional three dimensional (3D) virtual model that correspond to the adjacent physical teeth may appear to be connected, i.e., have no interproximal space. Various embodiments are provided for creating one or more digital tooth models that more accurately depict one or more physical teeth based on interproximal information that represents an interproximal space as a part of more successfully reducing or closing an interproximal space.

In situations where an interdental space is present, the space may be sufficiently small whereby the accurate reproduction of the pre-existing space in a dental model of the teeth may be difficult or impossible. These spaces may be naturally occurring or artificially introduced through orthodontic treatment, for example, or through mechanical means such as a dental procedure whereby the teeth are reshaped.

For example, in situations where dental crowding is present, or when certain teeth are not the correct/desired shape, recontouring of the teeth may be desirable (also called “interproximal reduction” or “IPR” for short). This can be accomplished through any number of dental instruments, including abrasive strips, discs, and/or burs. The result is that the teeth are narrowed and the resulting space in between the teeth is known as an interproximal space. An interproximal space may also be created by orthodontically moving adjacent teeth away from each other.

Depending on if the gum tissue, which normally occupies the undercut between adjacent teeth is present (also known as a papilla), the interproximal space may either be a vertical space with relatively uniform width from the occlusal-most portion of the contact to the gums, or in the case of missing papilla, a vertical space at the occlusal-most portion of the contact which opens up into a triangular space near the gum line due to the undercuts of the adjacent teeth and the missing papilla.

When small spaces are created, for example width-wise, or if teeth are obstructing the space due to crowding arrangements, trying to accurately determine the dimensions of the space using scans or impressions of the teeth can be particularly challenging. This is because, in order for the dimensions to be accurately captured, the impression material needs to flow in between the teeth and not be torn upon removal of the impression. If the material which flows in between the teeth becomes torn, then the resulting model of the teeth will appear as if the teeth are actually touching, when in fact, a space is present in between.

For digital scans of the teeth, small spaces may be difficult to accurately capture because the scan is unable to properly characterize the areas where a direct line of sight cannot be obtained as a result of obstruction from the tooth structure being scanned.

Therefore, according to one embodiment, a way to accurately capture the width and shape of the interproximal spaces (if any) is provided so that what is present in the mouth of the patient can be more accurately reproduced in a digital reconstruction of the patient’s teeth on the computer.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a patient’s physical teeth 100, according to one embodiment. For the sake of simplicity, FIG. 1 depicts a few of the patient’s physical teeth 100 a, 100 b, 100 c, 100 d instead of the entire set of the patient’s physical teeth 100. As depicted in FIG. 1 , there is a space 110 between the physical teeth 100 b, 100 c that are adjacent. According to one embodiment, at least a portion of the space 110 is a minimal space where the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c are closest to each other. The space 110 is also referred to as an interproximal space 110 and the physical teeth 100 b, 100 c that are adjacent are also referred to as adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c. The interproximal space 110 may be naturally occurring or may be artificially created. The physical teeth 100 b, 100 c have contours 130 a, 130 b in the area 120. The area between the contours 130 a, 130 b of adjacent teeth 100 b, 100 c defines the area 120 when the teeth are aligned along an arch.

When teeth are properly aligned along an arch as depicted in FIG. 1 , the interproximal space is defined by the narrowest distance between a mesial and distal surface of adjacent teeth 100 b and 100 c. However, if an adjacent tooth is rotated, as is commonly the case when teeth are not properly aligned, the interproximal space may be defined by the narrowest space between any surface of two adjacent teeth (e.g., mesial, distal, buccal, lingual or more commonly a contour portion).

Sometimes dental personnel artificially create an interproximal space 110 between aligned adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c in order to facilitate treatment. One way to artificially create an interproximal space 110 is interproximal reduction. As depicted in FIG. 1 , the interproximal space 110 is, at least in part, artificially created due to interproximal reduction, and, therefore, the physical tooth 100 c’s contour 130 b has a flattened surface. An interproximal space 110 may be artificially created using other methods such as expansion, retraction, and moving one or more teeth, for example, to avoid extracting teeth when the patient’s jaw is too small for their teeth to fit in.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a digital teeth model 200 that represents the patient’s set of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ), according to one embodiment. The digital teeth model 200 can be obtained with a digital scan, as described in paragraph (18) hereof. Many types of imaging or scanning may be used to obtain a digital teeth model 200. One example of an intraoral scanner that may be used is the Itero brand scanner by Cadent.

The digital teeth model 200 includes digital teeth 200 a-200 d that represents each of the patient’s physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ). Each of the digital teeth 200 a-200 d, according to one embodiment, represents one physical tooth 100 a-100 d. For example, digital tooth 200 a represents physical tooth 100 a, digital tooth 200 b represents physical tooth 100 b, digital tooth 200 c represents physical tooth 100 c, and digital tooth 200 d represents physical tooth 100 d. The adjacent digital teeth 200 b, 200 c respectively represent the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c.

The current technology for obtaining a digital teeth model 200 using a digital scan, as discussed herein may not accurately depict relatively small interproximal spaces. Therefore, the space 110 (FIG. 1 ) between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) may not be properly/accurately depicted in the digital teeth model 200. Instead, the adjacent digital teeth 200 b, 200 c (FIG. 2 ) appear to be at least partially connected, for example, at a location 210 in the digital teeth model 200. As will become more evident, the holes 220, which result from missing data, may be filled in, for example, during a cleanup process causing the adjacent digital teeth 200 b and 200 c to appear connected or a rough estimated interproximal gap may be created.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a conventional 3D virtual model 300 that was created based on a digital teeth model 200, according to one embodiment. Each of the digital teeth 300 a-300 d in the conventional 3D virtual model 300, according to one embodiment, represents one physical tooth 100 a-100 d (FIG. 1 ). For example, digital tooth 300 a represents physical tooth 100 a, digital tooth 300 b represents physical tooth 100 b, digital tooth 300 c represents physical tooth 100 c, and digital tooth 300 d represents physical tooth 100 d. The conventional 3D virtual model 300 includes adjacent digital teeth 300 b, 300 c that correspond to the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ).

The conventional 3D virtual model 300 may be created by a meshing process. Since the space 110 (FIG. 1 ) between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) is too small for a digital scan to recognize, the adjacent digital teeth 300 b, 300 c in the digital tooth 300 a-300 d model appear to be connected due to the current meshing process filling the holes 220 (FIG. 2 ) resulting in a filled in interproximal space 320 between the adjacent digital teeth 300 b, 300 c of the conventional 3D virtual model 300.

FIG. 4 illustrates the use of an instrument 400 to measure an interproximal space between adjacent physical teeth, according to one embodiment. According to one embodiment, the instrument 400 is a piece of metal, plastic or other material of a known thickness. The instrument 400 can be inserted between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ). Several instruments 400 of different known thicknesses can be used. For example, instruments 400 in increments of approximately 0.1 mm may be used. When the appropriate amount of resistance results from the insertion of a particular instrument 400, the thickness of that instrument 400 can be used as the interproximal information that represents the interproximal space 110 (FIG. 1 ). Each of the instruments 400 may have a label or other indicia specifying the thickness of each of the instruments 400.

FIGS. 9 a-9 f depict scannable objects that can be inserted between adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c and used as a part of determining interproximal information that represents a space 110 between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c, according to various embodiments. A digital teeth model can be created by performing a digital scan on the patient’s physical teeth 100 with a scannable object inserted snugly into a minimal space at the closest distance between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c. If physical impressions are used, the object may be captured within the impression either as a “negative” of the object or as part of a “pick up” impression, whereby the object remains physically embedded in the impression (in the same position where originally placed on the teeth) when the impression is removed. In this regard, the object is scannable indirectly whether as a negative geometry or as picked up via the impression. The scannable object can be digitally removed from the digital teeth model to obtain all, or a part of the interproximal information based on information related to the scannable object.

FIG. 9 a depicts scannable objects 900 a-1, 900 a-2 with a portion 910 a-1, 910 a-2, that is shim shaped with different thicknesses along the shim shaped portion 910 a-1, 910 a-2. The scannable objects 900 a-1, 900 a-2 also have non-shim shaped portions 920 a-1, 920 a-2.

FIG. 9 b depicts a scannable object 900B with a portion 910 b that is shim shaped with different thicknesses along the shim shaped portion 910 b. Although FIGS. 9 a and 9 b depict sides of the shim shaped portions 910 a-1, 910 b-2, 910 b that are symmetrical with respect to each other, various embodiments are well suited for the respective sides of the shim shaped portions 910 a-1, 910 b-2, 910 b to not be symmetrical.

FIG. 9 c depicts a scannable object 900 c that is a triodent V-wedge, according to one embodiment. The scannable object 900 c has a V shaped portion 920 c at the cross section indicated by the line, a curved portion 930 c, and a handle 910 c. The V shaped portion 920 c, according to one embodiment, is a shim shaped portion with different thicknesses along the shim shaped portion. The curved portion 930 c can be used as a part of approximating a curvature of contours associated with the adjacent physical teeth. The handle 910 c can have information describing parameters associated with the scannable object 900 c, such as the height, width, lateral curvature, base curvature, the point of the curvature and the radius of the curvature. The parameters can be used as a part of determining dimensional information associated with a space 110.

FIG. 9 d depicts a scannable object 900 d that is a Triodent “fender” inserted between adjacent physical teeth, according to one embodiment. The scannable object 900 d includes a metal shim shaped portion 910 d located at the apex 920 d of a V shaped portion 930 d. According to one embodiment, the V shaped portion 930 d is a shim shaped portion with different thicknesses along the shim shaped portion. According to one embodiment, the scannable object 900 d includes a curved portion 940 d. The curved portion 940 d can be used as a part of determining a curvature of contours associated with the adjacent physical teeth as depicted in FIG. 9 d .

FIG. 9 e depicts a scannable object 900 e that has notches 910 e, according to one embodiment. FIG. 9 f depicts a scannable object 900 f that has a shim shaped portion 910 f and a non shim shaped portion 920 f, according to one embodiment. The scannable objects 900 e 900 f depicted respectively in FIGS. 9 e and 9 f include respective indicia, such as notches 910 e or lines 930 f, that can be used for determining one or more dimensions associated with a space 110. According to one embodiment, the scannable object 900 c is a rigid object. According to one embodiment, any one or more of the scannable objects 900 a-900 g can be translucent. For example, assuming that the scanning device’s line of sight is located on one side of the translucent scannable object 900 a-900 g, the digital scan can at least approximate a tooth located on the other side of the translucent scannable object 900 a-900 g. However, various embodiments are well suited for a scannable objects 900 a-900 g that is opaque or semi-translucent, among other things.

According to one embodiment, a scannable object as depicted in FIGS. 9 a-9 f can have indicia that can be used for determining one or more dimensions associated with a space 110. For example, information pertaining to the geometry of a scannable object can be associated with a handle 910 c (FIG. 9 c ). In another example, notches 910 e (FIG. 9 e ) or lines 930 f (FIG. 9 f ) can be used to determine one or more dimensions of a space 110. Examples of a dimension include but are not limited to a width or a height associated with the space 110. A dimension may be a width associated with the minimal space based on the thickness of a portion of the scannable object. A dimension may be a height of an interproximal area that results from interproximal reduction of at least one of the adjacent physical teeth. The indicia can be used to determine one or more dimensions from a digital teeth model of the set of physical teeth taken with the scannable object inserted into the space 110, as will become more evident.

FIGS. 10 a-10 c depict scannable objects inserted between adjacent physical teeth, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 10 a depicts several scannable objects 900 b inserted between the adjacent physical teeth to more accurately determine the shape or size of the respective spaces 1010 a, 1020 a, 1030 a. The spaces 1010 a, 1020 a, 1030 a between various adjacent physical teeth in this illustration are triangular shaped. Each of the scannable objects 900 b depicted in FIG. 10 a may be different sizes selected to best fit the respective space 1010 a, 1020 a, 1030 a that they are inserted into.

FIG. 10 b depicts a scannable object 1010 b for determining a height associated with a space between adjacent physical teeth. The scannable object 1010 b has indicia 1020 b as described herein. The indicia 1020 b can be used to determine a height 1040 b of an interproximal area 1030 b that resulted from interproximal reduction of at least one 1050 b of the adjacent physical teeth. The indicia 1020 b can be used to determine a height 1060 b between the top 1070 b of at least one of the adjacent physical teeth and the papilla 1080 b of the gingival between the adjacent physical teeth.

FIG. 10 c depicts a scannable object 900 f (FIG. 9 f ) inserted between adjacent physical teeth that can also be used for determining a dimension associated with the space between the adjacent physical teeth. For example, the scannable object 900 f can be used for determining a width associated with the minimal space based on the thickness of a portion of the scannable object 900 f, determining a height of an interproximal area that results from interproximal reduction of at least one of the adjacent physical teeth, or determining a height between the top of at least one of the adjacent physical teeth and the papilla of the gingiva between the adjacent physical teeth, as discussed herein.

A first digital teeth model can be created by digitally scanning the set of physical teeth with a scannable object (FIGS. 9 a-9 f ) snugly inserted into the minimal space between the adjacent physical teeth and the scannable object can be digitally removed from the first digital teeth model to determine all or part of the interproximal based on information related to the scannable object. The scannable object can be removed, according to one embodiment, by receiving a second digital teeth model of the set of physical teeth of the patient without the scannable object inserted into the space and moving segmented teeth of the second digital teeth model to coincide with locations of the teeth of the first digital model.

A scannable object (FIGS. 9 a-9 f ) can be used for determining the closest distance between the adjacent physical teeth, a spatial orientation of the adjacent physical teeth relative to the closest distance and the location of the closest distance. For example, referring to FIG. 10 a , the positions of the scannable objects 900 b reflect the spatial orientation of the respective physical teeth that the scannable objects 900 b are between. The scannable objects 900 b can be inserted snugly into the respective spaces 1010 a, 1020 a, 1030 a to determine the locations of the closest distances between the respective adjacent physical teeth and to determine the spatial orientations relative to the closest distances.

One or more dimensions can be determined based on indicia associated with the scannable object (FIGS. 9 a-9 f ) in the first digital teeth model, as discussed herein. Indicia associated with an exposed portion of the inserted scannable object can be used to determine the one or more dimensions. Various embodiments are well suited to dimensions besides just width or height information. Various embodiments are well suited for any dimensional information that enables more accurately model the space between the adjacent physical teeth. For example, the dimensional information may include shapes or sizes, or a combination there of, among other things, of various portions or areas of the space. The dimensional information may be three-dimensional (3D) information. Scannable objects with curved shaped portions can be used to more accurately model curved contours and scannable objects with shim shaped portions can be used to more accurately model triangularly shaped contours, among other things as discussed herein. The best fitting scannable object, according to one embodiment, is selected for insertion to more accurately capture one or more dimensions associated with the space.

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a user interface 500, according to one embodiment. FIG. 5 is an example of a user interface 500 that is described by way of illustration and not by way of limitation. According to one embodiment, the user interface 500 is a part of a system that performs digital scans.

As illustrated in FIG. 5 , the user interface 500 depicts representations of teeth. Dental personnel, such as a doctor or a technician, can specify interproximal information using the user interface 500. For example, the dental personnel can specify a measurement between adjacent physical teeth, identification of the adjacent physical teeth, and identification of any physical teeth with flattened surfaces due to interproximal reduction, among other things. The adjacent physical teeth can be specified with respect to the other physical teeth. As depicted in FIG. 5 , adjacent physical teeth with respective interproximal spaces between them have been specified by circling 510 between the adjacent physical teeth. Other methods of specifying adjacent physical teeth can be used. For example, the name or location, or a combination there of can be used to specify adjacent physical teeth. The user interface 500 may receive information that an interproximal reduction is planned to be or has been performed on at least one of the adjacent physical teeth.

Although the user interface 500 illustrated in FIG. 5 depicts representations of teeth, various embodiments are well suited to a user interface 500 for specifying interproximal information without depicting representations of teeth. For example, other methods of specifying adjacent physical teeth can be used. For example, the user interface may provide fields or drop-down menus, among other things, for specifying the names of adjacent physical teeth or locations of adjacent physical teeth, the amount and/or special relationship of the interproximal space or a combination thereof.

Alternatively, or in addition to using the user interface 500, the dental personnel may submit a digital or physical form specifying the appropriate information, or a subset thereof, when sending the digital scan, for example, to a facility that creates digital tooth models, according to various embodiments. Other methods besides a user interface 500, such as a form, may also be used for specifying that an interproximal reduction is planned to be or has been performed on at least one of the adjacent physical teeth.

The specified interproximal information can be used as a part of a segmentation process that creates digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) from the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) while maintaining the interproximal space, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of created digital tooth models 600, according to one embodiment. According to one embodiment, the created digital tooth models 600 are three dimensional models of the patient’s physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ). Each of the digital tooth models 600, according to one embodiment, represents one physical tooth 100 (FIG. 1 ). For example, digital tooth model 600 a represents physical tooth 100 a, digital tooth model 600 b represents physical tooth 100 b, digital tooth model 600 c represents physical tooth 100 c, and digital tooth model 600 d represents physical tooth 100 d.

The digital tooth models 600 can be created based on the interproximal information that represents the space 110 (FIG. 1 ) between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) that correspond to the digital tooth models 600 b, 600 c (FIG. 6 ). According to one embodiment, the digital tooth models 600 are created as a part of segmenting the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) into the digital tooth models 600 while maintaining the interproximal space 610 (FIG. 6 ) based on the interproximal information pertaining to a physical interproximal space 110 (FIG. 1 ).

As discussed herein, with the conventional segmentation process, since the space 110 (FIG. 1 ) between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) is too small for a digital scan to recognize, the adjacent digital teeth 300 b, 300 c (FIG. 3 ) in the conventional three dimensional (3D) virtual model 300 (FIG. 3 ) appear to be, at least partially, connected due to the conventional meshing or other cleanup process filling the holes 2210 in the area at 210 between the adjacent digital teeth 220 b, 200 c (FIG. 2 ). In contrast, according to various embodiments, the segmentation process will receive interproximal information and will prevent filling the holes 210 (FIG. 2 ) and will use this information to help properly create the interproximal surfaces of adjacent teeth.

The digital tooth models 600 more accurately depict the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) than the digital teeth 200 b, 200 c (FIG. 2 ) in the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) due to being created based on the interproximal information, according to one embodiment. For example, since the interproximal space 110 between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c is too small for the digital scan to recognize, the interproximal space at location 210 is not properly depicted between the adjacent digital teeth 200 b, 200 c (FIG. 2 ) in the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ). When a conventional 3D virtual model 300 (FIG. 3 ) is created from the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ), the adjacent digital teeth 300 b, 300 c (FIG. 3 ) in the conventional 3D virtual model 300 (FIG. 3 ) appear to be connected in the interproximal space 320 (FIG. 3 ) between the digital teeth 300 b, 300 c. In contrast, according to various embodiments, interproximal information is obtained prior to or as part of performing the segmentation process on the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) to maintain the interproximal space 610 (FIG. 6 ) between respectively created digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ).

Further, the exemplary created digital tooth models 600 can more accurately depict the contours or flattened surfaces (where IPR has been performed) of the area of the adjacent physical teeth. For the sake of illustration, assume that the flattened surface (FIG. 6 ) of contour 630 a (FIG. 6 ) corresponds to the flattened surface of contour 130 a (FIG. 1 ) and the contours 630 a, 630 b (FIG. 6 ) correspond to the contours 130 a, 130 b (FIG. 1 ). The digital tooth model 600 c can more accurately depict a flattened surface associated with contour130 b of the corresponding physical tooth 100 c (FIG. 1 ), which was caused by interproximal reduction on that physical tooth 100 c, than a corresponding surface associated with the digital tooth 200 c (FIG. 2 ). Further, the contours 630 a, 630 b (FIG. 6 ) more accurately depict the contours 130 a, 130 b (FIG. 1 ) than corresponding surfaces associated with the digital teeth 200 b, 200 c (FIG. 2 ).

According to one embodiment, the contour of the tooth in this context is “visible contour” of the tooth when viewed from specified direction. In particular for the correct reconstruction of the tooth contours, the contour is the visible contour viewed from direction perpendicular to the dental arch and parallel to the occlusal plane. Due to possible imprecision of a digital scan, the interproximal space 320 between the teeth 300 b and 300 c may be filled and some of the contours are missed in the vicinity of the interproximal space 320 (FIG. 3 ). According to one embodiment, the interproximal space and associated visible contours are restored using the interproximal information that represents the interproximal spaces as described herein. If the space is identified by the personal as corresponding to “interproximal reduction,” then areas of the adjacent teeth can be restored on the 3D model to produce straight line contours and flat areas. If the space is identified as “natural”, then areas of the adjacent teeth can be restored on the 3D model to produce natural contours and convex areas. In both cases though the amount of space is equal to the distance measured on physical teeth, according to one embodiment.

The contours, if natural, can be obtained by many means including using information of or from: the contours of other of the patient’s teeth, based on photographs of the patient’s teeth, contours of standard teeth, a database of teeth contour information, or the contours can be created by a technician.

According to one embodiment, an elastic positioning dental appliance (also known as “an aligner”) for realigning teeth can be created based on the created digital tooth models 600. Such an appliance may be comprised of a thin shell of elastic material that generally conforms to a patient’s physical teeth but each appliance to be used at a treatment stage has a cavity geometry that is slightly out of alignment with the teeth arrangement at the start of that treatment stage. Placement of the elastic positioning dental appliance over the physical teeth applies controlled forces in specific locations to gradually move the physical teeth into a new arrangement.

A series of aligners can be used to move the physical teeth through a series of intermediate arrangements to a final desired arrangement. Due to the limited space within the oral cavity and extensive movements that some physical teeth may typically undergo for treatment, at least some of the physical teeth will often be moved throughout the series of intermediate arrangements to properly arrange the physical teeth. Thus, a single patient treated with elastic positioning dental appliance may experience from 2 to over 50 stages (with an average of 25-30 aligner stages per arch) before achieving the final desired teeth arrangement.

According to one embodiment, the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) is segmented into digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) so that the digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) can be based on the movement of the physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) through the series of intermediate patterns due to the course of treatment. Each of the digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) may have one or more axes of its own and three dimensional (3D) coordinates so that each of the digital tooth models‘ 600 position can be based on the position of a corresponding physical tooth 100 (FIG. 1 ) at a given point in time, as will be described in more detail in the context of FIG. 11 . By moving the digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ), intermediate aligners can be fabricated for each of the series of intermediate patterns of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) movement.

Various embodiments are provided for creating one or more digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) that more accurately depict one or more physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) based on interproximal information that represents the interproximal space 110 (FIG. 1 ). Thus, an aligner or a series of aligners that are created based on digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) that more accurately depict the physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ), according to various embodiments, can more successfully and more easily properly align the teeth and close or significantly reduce or enlarge, as desired, the interproximal spaces 110 (FIG. 1 ) between the patient’s teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ).

More information pertaining to the planning and fabrication of aligners as dental appliances is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No 5,975,893, and in published PCT application WO 98/58596 which designates the United States and which is assigned to the assignee of the present application.

FIG. 7 illustrates a system 700 for creating a digital tooth model 600 (FIG. 6 ) of a patient’s tooth 100 (FIG. 1 ) using interproximal information, according to one embodiment. The blocks that represent features in FIG. 7 can be arranged differently than as illustrated and can implement additional or fewer features than what are described herein. Further, the features represented by the blocks in FIG. 4 can be combined in various ways. The system 700 can be implemented using hardware, hardware and software, hardware and firmware, or a combination thereof. According to one embodiment, the system 700 is part of a system that performs segmentation, as discussed herein.

The system 700 can include an interproximal-information-obtaining-component 710, a digital-teeth-model-receiving-component 720, and a digital-tooth-model-creation-component 730. The system 700 may also include an optional physical-tooth-specification-component 712.

The interproximal-information-obtaining-component 710 is configured for receiving interproximal information that represents a space 110 (FIG. 1 ) between adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) of the patient. The space 110 (FIG. 1 ) may represent a naturally occurring space between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c or represent an artificially created space between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c.

The digital-teeth-model-receiving-component 720 is configured for receiving a digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) of a set of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) of the patient that includes the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ). The digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) can be obtained from a digital scan as described above of the set of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ).

The digital-tooth-model-creation-component 730 is configured for creating one or more digital tooth models 600 a-600 d (FIG. 6 ) that more accurately depicts one or more of the physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) than corresponding digital teeth 200 a-200 d (FIG. 2 ) included in the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) based on the interproximal information.

The digital-tooth-model-creation-component 730 may be further configured for creating digital tooth models 600 b, 600 c (FIG. 6 ) representing the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ), which more accurately depict contours 130 a, 130 b (FIG. 1 ) of the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) in area 120 (FIG. 1 ) between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ), for creating a digital tooth model 600 c (FIG. 6 ) that more accurately depicts a flattened surface of contour 130 b of a physical tooth 100 c (FIG. 1 ) due to interproximal reduction, or for creating a digital tooth model 600 c (FIG. 6 ) based on information indicating that an interproximal reduction is planned to be or has been performed on at least one of the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ), or a combination thereof.

The system 700 may also include a physical-tooth-specification-component 712 configured for receiving information specifying which of the set of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) are. According to one embodiment, the information specifying which of the set of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) are, is a part of the interproximal information and may be received by the interproximal-information-obtaining-component 710. The physical-tooth-specification-component 712 may be a part of the interproximal-information-obtaining-component 710 or may communicate with the interproximal-information-obtaining-component 710.

The system 700 can include one or more computer processors for performing the operations of receiving of the interproximal information, the receiving of the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) and the creating of the one or more digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ).

FIG. 8 illustrates a method of creating a digital tooth model of a patient’s tooth using interproximal information, according to one embodiment.

At 810, the method begins.

At 820, interproximal information is received that represents a space 110 (FIG. 1 ) between adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) of the patient. For example, an instrument 400 (FIG. 4 ) can be inserted between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ). Several instruments 400 of different known widths can be used. When the appropriate amount resistance results from the insertion of a particular instrument 400, the width of that instrument 400 can be used as the interproximal space 110 (FIG. 1 ). Each of the instruments 400 may have a label or other indicia (such as numbers, shape, colors, letters, notches, etc.), including geometric indicia, specifying the thickness of each of the instruments 400.

The thickness associated with the instrument 400 that provides appropriate resistance can be entered into a user interface 500 (FIG. 5 ). Further, the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) can be specified by a user interface 500. The user interface 500 may be a part of a system that performs digital scans which may be used by a treating professional, lab, service provider or manufacturer.

Various embodiments are also well suited for receiving interproximal information that represents a space 110 obtained, at least in part, by inserting a scannable object (FIGS. 9 a-9 f ) in the space 110, as described in the context of FIGS. 9 a-10 c .

According to one embodiment, information is received that specifies the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) with respect to other physical teeth 100 a, 100 d (FIG. 1 ) associated with the set of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ). For example, the interproximal information can also include identification of the adjacent teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) that were specified by circling 510 (FIG. 5 ) representations of teeth displayed on a user interface 500, identifications of the adjacent teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ), or names of the adjacent teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ), among other things.

The received interproximal information can represent a naturally occurring space 110 between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) or an artificially created space 110 between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ).

Information can be received indicating that an interproximal reduction is planned to be or has been performed on at least one of the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ). This information may be a part of or separate from the received interproximal information.

The interproximal information, according to one embodiment, is obtained prior to the segmentation process, for example, by a system that performs digital scans. The interproximal information may be communicated to an interproximal-information-obtaining-component 710 of the system 700 (FIG. 7 ). The system 700 may be a part of a segmentation system.

At 830, a digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) of a set of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) of the patient that includes the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) is received. For example, a digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) of a set of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) that includes adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) can be received by a digital-teeth-model-receiving-component 720 of the system 700 (FIG. 7 ).

The received digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) can be derived from a digital scan of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ), as described above. The interproximal information received at 820 may be included in a digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) that is received at 830.

At 840, one or more digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) is created that more accurately depicts one or more of the physical teeth 100 a-100 d (FIG. 1 ) than corresponding digital teeth 200 a-200 d (FIG. 2 ) included in the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) based on the interproximal information. For example, one or more digital tooth models 600 a-600 d (FIG. 6 ) can be created by a digital-tooth-model-creation-component 730 of the system 700 (FIG. 7 ). The digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) can be created based on the interproximal information that represents the space 110 (FIG. 1 ) between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) that correspond to the digital tooth models 600 b, 600 c (FIG. 6 ).

The digital tooth models 600 b, 600 c (FIG. 6 ) more accurately depict the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) than the digital teeth 200 b, 200 c (FIG. 2 ) in the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) due to being created based on the interproximal information, according to one embodiment. For example, since the interproximal space 110 (FIG. 1 ) between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) may be too small for a digital scan to recognize, the interproximal space 110 is not properly/accurately depicted between the adjacent digital teeth 200 b, 200 c (FIG. 2 ) in the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ). The area associated with the interproximal space 110 between the adjacent digital teeth 200 b, 200 c (FIG. 2 ) may be, at least partially, connected with some holes 220. When a conventional 3D virtual model 300 (FIG. 3 ) is created from the digital teeth model 200, the holes 220 (FIG. 2 ) in the digital teeth model 200 may be filled causing the adjacent digital teeth 300 b, 300 c (FIG. 3 ) in the conventional 3D virtual model 300 (FIG. 3 ) to be connected in the vicinity of the interproximal space 320 (FIG. 3 ). In contrast, according to various embodiments, interproximal information is obtained prior to or as part of performing the segmentation process on the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) and can be used as a part of the segmentation process to maintain the interproximal space 110 (FIG. 1 ) as depicted at interproximal space 610 (FIG. 6 ) between respectively created digital tooth models 600 b, 600 c (FIG. 6 ). According to one embodiment, the interproximal space 610 is an interproximal space model.

Further, the exemplary created digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) can more accurately depict naturally occurring or, at least partially created, contours of the area of the adjacent physical teeth. Assume for the sake of illustration that contours 630 a, 630 b (FIG. 6 ) correspond to contours 130 a, 130 b (FIG. 1 ) and that area 620 (FIG. 6 ) corresponds to area 120 (FIG. 1 ). In this case, the contours 630 a, 630 b (FIG. 6 ) of the digital tooth models 600 b, 600 c (FIG. 6 ) can more accurately depict the contours 130 a, 130 b (FIG. 1 ) of the interproximal area 120(FIG. 1 ) than corresponding surfaces associated with corresponding digital teeth 300 b, 300 c (FIG. 3 ) of the conventional 3D virtual model 300 (FIG. 3 ).

The digital tooth model 600 c (FIG. 6 ) can more accurately depict the flattened surface of the corresponding physical tooth that was caused by interproximal reduction on that physical tooth. Assume for the sake of illustration that the flattened surface associated with contour 630 b (FIG. 6 ) of digital model 600 c (FIG. 6 ) corresponds to the flattened surface associated with contour 130 b (FIG. 1 ) of the physical tooth 100 c (FIG. 1 ). In this case, the flattened surface of the digital tooth model 600 c (FIG. 6 ) can more accurately depict the flattened surface of the physical tooth 100 c (FIG. 1 ) than a corresponding surface of digital tooth 300 c (FIG. 3 ) of the conventional 3D virtual model 300 (FIG. 3 ).

At 850, the method ends.

The receiving of the interproximal information at 820, the receiving of the digital teeth model at 830 and the creating of the one or more digital tooth models at 840 can be performed, for example, by one or more computer processors associated with a system 700 (FIG. 7 ).

According to one embodiment, a dental appliance or a series of dental appliances can be fabricated based on the digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) that more accurately depict the patient’s physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) based on the interproximal information. A dental appliance or a series of dental appliances that more accurately depict the patient’s physical teeth 100, according to various embodiments, can more successfully and more easily align teeth and may close or significantly reduce or enlarge, as desired, an interproximal space 110 (FIG. 1 ) between the patient’s teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ).

According to one embodiment, a digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) is segmented into digital tooth models 600 a-600 d (FIG. 6 ) so that the digital tooth models 600 a-600 d can be used as a basis for the movement of corresponding physical teeth 100 a-100 d (FIG. 1 ) through the series of intermediate arrangements during the course of treatment. Each of the digital tooth models 600 a-600 d may have one or more axes of its own and three dimensional (3D) coordinates so that each of the digital tooth models‘ 600 a-600 d can be freely positioned in 3D space based on the position of a corresponding physical tooth 100 a-100 d at a given point in time. The 3D coordinates alone or 3D coordinates in combination with one or more axes of each of the digital tooth models 600 a-600 d can be used to match or closely approximate the position of each of the corresponding physical teeth 100 a-100 d. Intermediate and final aligners can be fabricated based on each of the series of intermediate and final arrangements.

For example, FIG. 11 depicts one tooth 1100 that may be used to match or closely approximate the position of a corresponding tooth, according to one embodiment. According to one embodiment, the digital tooth 1100 represents a segmented or partially segmented digital tooth, that has one or more axes and three dimensional (3D) coordinates so that the digital tooth 1100 can be freely positioned in 3D space. For example, the 3D coordinates x, y, and z alone or 3D coordinates x, y, and z in combination with one or more axes 1104, 1106, 1108 can be used for positioning the digital tooth 1100.

As a frame of reference describing how a digital tooth 1100 may be moved, an arbitrary centerline (CL) may be drawn through the digital tooth 1600. With reference to this centerline (CL), a tooth 1100 may be moved in orthogonal directions represented by axes 1104, 1106, and 1108 (where 1104 is the centerline). The centerline may be rotated about the axis 1108 (root angulation) and the axis 1104 (torque) as indicated by arrows 1110 and 1112, respectively. Additionally, the tooth 1100 may be rotated about the centerline, as represented by an arrow 1112. Thus, all possible free-form motions of the tooth 1100 can be performed.

Although specific operations are disclosed in flowchart 800, such operations are exemplary. That is, embodiments of the present invention are well suited to performing various other operations or variations of the operations recited in flowchart 800. It is appreciated that the operations in flowchart 800 can be performed in an order different than presented, and that not all of the operations in flowchart 800 can be performed.

The above illustration is only provided by way of example and not by way of limitation. There are other ways of performing the method described by flowchart 800.

FIGS. 12A and 12B depict an example of a patient’s physical teeth at various stages of position as a part of performing interproximal reduction, according to various embodiments. Interproximal reduction can be used to avoid moving physical teeth along the arch to create space for other teeth to move (also referred to as “distillization”) or extraction of one or more physical teeth.

The patient’s set of physical teeth include physical teeth 12 a-12 f. Each physical tooth 12 a-12 f has a distal and a mesial surface. For example, physical tooth 12 a has a distal surface a 1 and mesial surface a 2, physical tooth 12 b has a distal surface b 1 and mesial surface b 2, physical tooth 12 c has a distal surface c 1 and mesial surface c 2, physical tooth 12 d has a distal surface d 1 and mesial surface d 2, and physical tooth 12 e has a distal surface e 1 and mesial surface e 2.

The physical teeth 12 a-12 f are depicted at five different stages 90 a-90 e of position. The patient’s set of physical teeth 12 a-12 f are depicted in relationship to the arch 80 and medial axis 70 of the patient’s jaw at each stage 90 a-90 e.

At the initial stage 90 a of alignment, the physical teeth 12 b, 12 c, 12 d are overlapping. More specifically, the mesial surface b 2 of physical tooth 12 b is in front of the distal surface c 1 of physical tooth 12 c, the mesial surface c 2 of physical tooth 12 c is in front of the distal surface d 1 of physical tooth 12 d.

At stage 90 b, physical teeth 12 c, 12 d are moved outwards to remove the overlapping of the physical teeth 12 b, 12 c, 12 d. As depicted, the physical teeth 12 c, 12 d are moved by tilting them toward the patient’s lips.

At stage 90 c, physical teeth 12 c, 12 d are rotated to orient the mesial surface and distal surface of adjacent physical teeth 12 b, 12 c, 12 d, 12 e in preparation of interproximal reduction at locations 60 a, 60 b, and 60 c. More specifically as depicted in this illustration, the physical teeth 12 c, 12 d are rotated to orient mesial surface b 2 toward the distal surface c 1 for adjacent physical teeth 12 b, 12 c, the mesial surface c 2 toward the distal surface d 1 for adjacent physical teeth 12 c, 12 d, and the mesial surface d 2 toward the distal surface e 1 for adjacent physical teeth 12 d, 12 e. As can be seen, the physical teeth 12 b, 12 c, 12 d, 12 e are slightly forward of the arch 80 at stage 90 c because the physical teeth 12 b, 12 c, 12 d, 12 e are still too large to be moved back into the arch 80.

According to one embodiment, interproximal reduction can be performed at locations 60 a, 60 b, and 60 c resulting in interproximal spaces 10 a, 10 b, 10 c as depicted in stage 90 d. The positions of the physical teeth 12 a-12 f are the same in stages 90 c and 90 d. The interproximal spaces 10 a, 10 b, 10 c provide sufficient room to move the physical teeth 12 b, 12 c, 12 d, 12 e into the arch 80 and to properly align each of the physical teeth 12 a-12 f with respect to each other as depicted in stage 90 e.

Various embodiments provide for correcting scan data of physical teeth in a current position to better represent contours of physical teeth in the vicinity of an interproximal space for treatment and possibly for performing interproximal reduction. For example, referring to stage 90 a using a conventional method, the triangular areas between respective overlapping adjacent physical teeth 12 b, 12 c, 12 d may be filled with data. Further, the contours of the triangular areas on the lingual side may appear to be closer to the tongue than is the case in reality and the contours of the triangular areas on the buccal side may appear to be closer to the lips than is the case in reality. Further, the interproximal spaces between the physical teeth 12 a, 12 b and 12 d and 12 e may be filled in resulting in adjacent physical teeth 12 a, 12 b and adjacent physical teeth 12 d and 12 e appearing to be connected.

In contrast, using various embodiments, various scannable objects as depicted in FIGS. 9 a-9 f , can be inserted into the interproximal spaces between adjacent physical teeth and a digital scan can be taken. For example, a scannable object may be inserted between physical teeth 12 c and 12 d. Due to the overlap of the adjacent physical teeth 12 c and 12 d, the scannable object may lay in an approximately flat position on the buccal surface between physical teeth 12 c and 12 d. The scannable object can be used as a part of extrapolating contours associated with the physical teeth 12 c and 12 d as discussed herein. Similarly, scannable objects can be inserted between other adjacent physical teeth depicted in FIGS. 12A and 12B. Although the use of various embodiments to better represent contours of physical teeth in the vicinity of an interproximal space have been discussed in the context of physical teeth 12 a-12 f at stage 90 a, various embodiments are well suited for better representation of contours of physical teeth at other stages 90 b-90 e.

Thus, various embodiments can be used for correcting digital scan data of physical teeth in a current position to better represent contours of physical teeth in the vicinity of an interproximal space between those physical teeth.

Any one or more of the embodiments described herein can be implemented using non-transitory computer readable storage medium and computer-executable instructions which reside, for example, in computer-readable storage medium of a computer system or like device. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium can be any kind of memory that instructions can be stored on. Examples of the non-transitory computer readable storage medium include but are not limited to a disk, a compact disk (CD), a digital versatile device (DVD), read only memory (ROM), flash, and so on. As described above, certain processes and operations of various embodiments of the present invention are realized, in one embodiment, as a series of instructions (e.g., software program) that reside within non-transitory computer readable storage memory of a computer system and are executed by the computer processor of the computer system. When executed, the instructions cause the computer system to implement the functionality of various embodiments of the present invention. According to one embodiment, the non-transitory computer readable storage medium is tangible.

According to one embodiment, a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon for causing a computer system to perform a method of creating a digital tooth model of a patient’s tooth using interproximal information is provided. For example, interproximal information is received that represents a space 110 (FIG. 1 ) between adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) associated with a set of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ). The space 110 can be a naturally occurring space between the adjacent physical teeth or an artificially created space. Interproximal information can be determined by manually inserting pieces of material, which each have a different thickness, between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 4 ). User specified information specifying the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) with respect to other physical teeth 100 a, 100 d (FIG. 1 ) associated with the set of physical teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) can be received. The received user specified information can be specified by a circle 510 (FIG. 5 ) around visual representations of the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ), identification information of the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ), or locations of the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ), or a combination thereof.

Further, according to one embodiment, the non-transitory computer readable storage medium provides for the creation of digital tooth models 600 b, 600 c (FIG. 6 ) that more accurately depict the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) than corresponding digital teeth 200 b, 200 c (FIG. 2 ) included in a digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) based on the interproximal information, according to one embodiment. For example, one or more digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) can be created that include adjacent digital tooth models 600 b, 600 c (FIG. 6 ) that more accurately depict contours 130 a, 130 b (FIG. 1 ) of the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ). An area associated with the interproximal space 110 (FIG. 2 ) of the digital teeth model 200 (FIG. 2 ) that corresponds to the space 110 (FIG. 1 ) between the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) can be identified and a digital tooth model 600 b, 600 c (FIG. 6 ) can be created that represents one of the adjacent physical teeth 100 b, 100 c (FIG. 1 ) by preventing the digital tooth model 600 b, 600 c (FIG. 6 ) from extending into an area 610 (FIG. 6 ).

Creating digital tooth models 600 (FIG. 6 ) of a patient’s teeth 100 (FIG. 1 ) using interproximal information which enables more accurate digital tooth models at least provides, for example, improved fitting dental appliance, improved treatment outcome, improved closure or opening of interproximal spaces, more confidence for the dental personnel, and the ability to better track interproximal space closure from a research and development stand point.

Example embodiments of the subject matter are thus described. Although the subject matter has been described in a language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.

Various embodiments have been described in various combinations and illustrations. However, any two or more embodiments or features may be combined. Further, any embodiment or feature may be used separately from any other embodiment or feature. Phrases, such as “an embodiment,” “one embodiment,” among others, used herein, are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Features, structures, or characteristics of any embodiment may be combined in any suitable manner with one or more other features, structures, or characteristics. 

1-3. (canceled)
 4. A method of generating a digital dental model of a patient’s teeth, the method comprising: receiving, by a digital-teeth-model-receiving-component, a first digital scan of the patient’s teeth, wherein the first digital scan comprises a first three-dimensional digital teeth model; receiving, by the digital-teeth-model-receiving-component, a second digital scan of the patient’s teeth, wherein the second digital scan comprises a scannable object inserted in an interproximal space between a first tooth and a second tooth of the patient’s teeth; determining, by an interproximal-information-obtaining-component, interproximal information of the patient’s teeth, wherein the interproximal information is based at least in part on the second digital scan; and generating, by a digital-teeth-model-creation-component, a modified three-dimensional digital teeth model based at least in part on the interproximal information, thereby providing a depiction of the interproximal space between the first tooth and the second tooth of the patient’s teeth.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein a dimension of the scannable object is known.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the dimension is a thickness.
 7. The method of claim 5, wherein the interproximal information is determined at least in part on the dimension.
 8. The method of claim 4, wherein dimensions of the interproximal space cannot be determined from the first digital scan.
 9. The method of claim 4, wherein the interproximal information comprises a distance of the interproximal space between the first tooth and the second tooth of the patient’s teeth.
 10. The method of claim 4, wherein the modified three-dimensional digital is generated by digitally removing, from the first three-dimensional digital teeth model, three-dimensional model portions corresponding to the interproximal space between the first tooth and the second tooth of the patient.
 11. The method of claim 4, wherein the modified three-dimensional digital teeth model comprises one or more flattened surfaces for representing at least a portion of the first tooth or the second tooth near the interproximal space.
 12. The method of claim 4, further comprising displaying, on a user interface, a visual representation corresponding to the modified three-dimensional digital tooth model.
 13. The method of claim 4, wherein the scannable object comprises varying thickness along a body of the scannable object.
 14. The method of claim 4, wherein the scannable object comprises a shim shape.
 15. The method of claim 4, wherein the scannable object comprises different thicknesses in different portions of the scannable object.
 16. The method of claim 4, wherein the scannable object comprises a curved portion.
 17. The method of claim 4, wherein the scannable object comprises at least one indicia disposed thereon.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the at least one indicia facilitates determining of the interproximal information of the patient’s teeth.
 19. The method of claim 17, wherein the at least one indicia is a notch or a line.
 20. The method of claim 4, wherein the interproximal information represents a naturally occurring interproximal space between the first tooth and the second tooth of the patient’s teeth.
 21. The method of claim 4, wherein the interproximal information represents an artificially created interproximal space between the first tooth and the second tooth of the patient’s teeth.
 22. The method of claim 4, further comprising generating a geometry for at least one dental appliance based at least in part on the modified three-dimensional digital teeth model.
 23. The method of claim 4, further comprising tracking closure of the interproximal space between a first tooth and a second tooth of the patient’s teeth. 